In the fast-paced world of K-pop, labels matter, and fans are quick to defend the dignity of their favorite groups.

Recently, a storm brewed in the K-pop community as TXT fans expressed their discontent with the label "BTS dongsaeng group."

The controversy emerged after an original tweet, which has since been deleted, criticized the use of the term and suggested an alternative like 'great performers' for BTS.

Social Media Erupts: Fans Speak Out

The sentiment resonated among TXT fans, leading to the creation of a trending hashtag that expressed their collective displeasure.

The common thread in the fans' reactions centered around the belief that such labeling undermines the artistic identity of TXT. Comments flooded various social media platforms, with fans echoing their dissatisfaction.

Many fans argue that TXT has outgrown the "dongsaeng group" label, citing the group's achievements and seniority in the industry.

The discontent goes beyond TXT fandom, with some BTS fans also expressing their disapproval of the term.

The prevailing opinion is that the label not only misrepresents TXT's status but also perpetuates a negative stigma associated with being branded as a "dongsaeng group."

Running Man Controversy: Context Adds Fuel to the Fire

The controversy gained traction after the popular show Running Man referred to TXT as BTS' "dongsaeng group."

Fans speculated on the show's motive, considering its diverse audience, with some pointing out that the term might have been used for clarity among non-idol fans.

However, this explanation did little to quell the discontent within the fandoms.

READ ALSO: BTS Stuns ARMY with Unexpected Resurgence of Classic Hits Released Several Years Ago- Here's Why 

Whether a fan of BTS or TXT, the consensus appears to be that nobody appreciates being labeled as a "dongsaeng group." Fans feel that the term diminishes the accomplishments and individuality of both groups, sparking a united front against its usage.

The controversy has not been without its share of online tension. Fans predict that the backlash may attract trolls and create unnecessary friction between the fandoms.

Despite the potential for conflict, supporters of both groups have found common ground in their opposition to the disputed label.

While some fans acknowledge the potential need for subtitles and explanations for non-idol audiences, they argue that perpetuating the "dongsaeng group" label is counterproductive and fuels discontent among dedicated fanbases.

Other Netizens' Reaction

Here are the reactions from TXT fans as they vocalized their dissatisfaction with the term "BTS dongsaeng group.

" I don't like the word 'younger brother group', but didn't you use it because it's a word that Muggles can understand more than 'hive affiliation'? The main audience is not idol fans. If fans don't like it, they don't like it. The production team must have found the most appropriate word for viewers to understand"
"I don't like it, but even here, there are people who scratch and aggro T-fans with that. I see it sometimes, but
"I didn't like it. I had no sense of subtitles. That was"
"I might not like it... It's a group with a lot of years of experience, but aren't there enough other qualifiers"
"I might dislike it, but I'm not a newbie with nothing to introduce yet,"
"There's no one who won't like it.. I don't like subtitles like that even though I'm a regular fan."
"yes, we both feel bad for each other haha ​​Kepler's grades + popularity and ㅇㅅㅇ grades + popularity cannot be compared so it is meaningless haha"

In summary, the hashtag trending among TXT fans highlights a shared sentiment of disapproval towards the labeling of their favorite group.

The controversy raises broader questions about the impact of such labels on the K-pop landscape and the delicate balance between accessibility for general audiences and maintaining the artistic integrity of idol groups.

 YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN: TXT Stirs Up Controversy with Album Design- Is it a Hit or a Miss? 

Follow and subscribe to KpopStarz for more news.
KpopStarz own this article.
Cassidy Jones wrote this.