August 16 ,In a move that has ignited a wave of criticism across digital platforms, FIFTY FIFTY has drawn the ire of netizens for its steadfast refusal to engage in negotiations with ATTRAKT during a recent mediation court proceeding.
Judge's Ruling Shifts Dispute to Mediation Court
The development came to light through an exclusive report by TV Daily, revealing that FIFTY FIFTY unequivocally communicated their unwillingness to negotiate and further conveyed their willingness to meet with ATTRAKT only under the condition of contract termination.
The backdrop to this standoff was a previous decision by a judge to shift the legal dispute between the two entities to mediation court, with the aspiration that a middle ground could be reached amicably.
Unlike civil courts, mediation courts rely on judges acting as arbitrators who facilitate a compromise between conflicting parties.
However, the arbitration is non-binding, affording both parties the prerogative to decline the proposed solution, in which case the matter would revert to a civil trial.
Netizens' comments:
- "They can't go back because if they do, it would be like admitting they were wrong, LOL. They won't ever go back. They are going to do whatever it takes to end their contract and try to promote themselves off the strength of their names."
- "But seriously, do they have somebody getting their back? There has to be someone in their camp that knows going back is their best choice. Don't you think someone on their side knows better? I feel like there is more to this story than we know. I'm so curious."
- "The agency seems to be willing to accept the members again if things go well after talking to each other..."
- "If I go back now, it's like admitting everything I did wrong. Even if I knew I was wrong, I would never go back"
- "You can promote overseas all you want. Just don't come to Korea. Then again, even if they were to walk in front of me, I wouldn't be able to recognize them.
Yet, FIFTY FIFTY's resolute rejection of the negotiation process has generated significant backlash. Critics argue that their refusal flies in the face of the spirit of mediation court, thwarting the purpose of finding a middle ground.
The decision has drawn particularly sharp condemnation on social media platforms, where users express their disappointment and frustration with the entertainment company's stance.
The intensifying outrage in response to their actions underscores the complex relationship between legal proceedings and public perception, leaving many to speculate on the potential repercussions for the company's reputation.
Amidst an unexpected twist, an individual self-identifying as a relative of a FIFTY FIFTY member made waves on July 14 by utilizing social media as a platform to cast doubt on the authenticity of a recent report targeting the popular girl group.
Follow and subscribe to KpopStarz for more news.
KpopStarz own this article.
Cassidy Jones wrote this.
